Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt, LLP
About Us Careers Contact Us Search
Home Practice Areas Industries Case Results Attorneys Publications Events Press Room

Impact of the Recent Supreme Court Decision on the Law of Insider Trading

January 26, 2017

The Dec 6, 2016 court ruling in US v Salman clarifies the “personal benefit” requirement and eases the government’s burden of proving insider trading cases. But how does this impact other decisions such as US v Newman and the prosecution of future insider trading cases? While the government need not show that the tipper has received something of tangible value, it raises the question of when the relationship between tipper and tippee reaches the level which would satisfy this lesser “personal benefit” requirement. Head of Tannenbaum Helpern’s Governmental and Regulatory Investigations Practice and securities litigator Ralph Siciliano held a lively, in-depth discussion addressing these and other critical questions in light of the Salman decision. Watch the video.



 

Speaker:
Ralph Siciliano
Partner, Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP

Venue:
Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP
900 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Agenda:
8:00 am - 8:30 am: Networking and Check-In
8:30 am - 9:30 am: Panel

RSVP: Email Tara Fragiacomo at fragiacomo@thsh.com with your first and last name, title, company name and email address or click here to register.

Like us on FaceBook Follow us on Twitter Get LinkedIn with us Pin It! Email Us Print this Page

Sitemap | Terms of Use | Privacy | Attorney Advertising

Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP provides legal advice only to individuals or entities with which it has established an attorney-client relationship and such advice is based on the particular facts and circumstances of each matter. Contacting us through this site, or otherwise, will not establish an attorney-client relationship with us. Any e-mail or other communication sent to THSH or its lawyers through this site will not be treated as subject to the attorney-client privilege or as otherwise confidential and you should not include any confidential information in any such communication.